Home

Advertisement

Customize
 
The article starts off with an example of how young truth-seekers destroy the sanctified findings and images of this kind. A boy explaining himself using the phrase “scientific paper” allows the misperception that science doesn’t explain anything. The article continues on with other examples of common myths and explanations such as Greeks and Middles Ages’ view of the earth’s shape and how it came to be formed that way. Then the article continues on explaining other mythic notions that dictate our findings and provide “explanations” to the world’s questions. Comparative cultural studies have been found everywhere all the way from Aztec Mexico to Dante’s Mountain of Purgatory. Then the article turns into an explanation of how now days, people no longer take these examples seriously, even a kindergartner.
            To me, this article makes perfect sense. As times have passed, we have created our own founded taboos. Then when thinking of the question; are the two, (science and myth) on every level, at odds? Or is there not some point of wisdom beyond the conflicts of illusion and truth by which lives can be put back together again? The answer to this question, in my opinion, is that the original findings will have to come from the source and nature of myth, since our moral orders and taboo procedures have all been based on myth for many years. The impact of science results unavoidably. Since myths have created and been transformed into general facts, it is easy to put these facts in question. What worries me is what will happen in a society where children are now taught to fight the moral and mythological truth that has existed for many years previous to their own.
 
 
28 November 2007 @ 11:07 am
Comparaive Religion terms:
Shamanism- belief in powerful spirits that can be influenced only by shamans.
Totemism- the system of tribal division according to totems.
Animism- the belief that natural objects, natural phenomena, and the universe itself possess souls.
Levi Strauss- founder of structural anthropology. French Anthropologist
Collective Consciousness- shared beliefs and moral attitudes which
operate as a unifying force within society.
Anima- the inner personality that is turned toward the unconscious of the individual.
Animus- strong dislike or enmity; hostile attitude; animosity.
Shadow side- relates to life much more authentically
Monomyth- description of a basic pattern found in many narratives from around the world.
Transpersonal Psych- a school of psychology that studies the transpersonal,
Communitas- the sense of sharing and intimacy that develops among persons who experience liminality as a group.
Carl Jung- Swiss psychologist
Depth Psychology- any approach to psychology that postulates and studies personality from the standpoint of dynamic and unconscious motivation.
Semiotics- the study of signs and symbols as elements of communicative behavior; the analysis of systems of communication, as language, gestures, or clothing.
Liminality- the transitional period or phase of a rite of passage, during which the participant lacks social status or rank, remains anonymous, shows obedience and humility, and follows prescribed forms of conduct, dress, etc.
Fetish- an object regarded with awe as being the embodiment or habitation of a potent spirit or as having magical potency.
Taboo- proscribed by society as improper or unacceptable: taboo words.
Archetype- the original pattern or model from which all things of the same kind are copied or on which they are based; a model or first form; prototype.
Rite of Passage- any important act or event that serves to mark a passage from one stage of life to another.

Creation Narratives From Different Religions:


Islam- the religious faith of Muslims, based on the words and religious system founded by the prophet Muhammad and taught by the Koran, the basic principle of which is absolute submission to a unique and personal god, Allah.
Buddhism- a religion, originated in India by Buddha (Gautama) and later spreading to China, Burma, Japan, Tibet, and parts of southeast Asia, holding that life is full of suffering caused by desire and that the way to end this suffering is through enlightenment that enables one to halt the endless sequence of births and deaths to which one is otherwise subject.
Hinduism- the common religion of India, based upon the religion of the original Aryan settlers as expounded and evolved in the Vedas, the Upanishads, the Bhagavad-Gita, etc., having an extremely diversified character with many schools of philosophy and theology, many popular cults, and a large pantheon symbolizing the many attributes of a single god. Buddhism and Jainism are outside the Hindu tradition but are regarded as related religions.
Shinto- the native religion of Japan, primarily a system of nature and ancestor worship.
Big Bang Theory- a theory that deduces a cataclysmic birth of the universe (big bang) from the observed expansion of the universe, cosmic background radiation, abundance of the elements, and the laws of physics.
Evolution theory- A theory in crisis in light of the tremendous
advances we've made in molecular biology, biochemistry, and genetics.

Stage theories:

Freud- 1856–1939, Austrian neurologist: founder of psychoanalysis.
Erikson- 1902–94, U.S. psychoanalyst, born in Germany.
Bolby- British psychiatrist, the son of an eminent surgeon. He studied at Cambridge, and became staff psychologist at the London Child Guidance Clinic (1937–40). After World War 2 he moved to the Tavistock Clinic (1946–72), to become chairman of the department for children and parents (1946–68). His early research concerned crime and juvenile delinquency, but he is best known for his work on the effects of maternal deprivation upon the mental health and emotional development of children.
Piaget- Swiss psychologist: studied cognitive development of children.

Psychoanalytic terms:
Infantile libido- which enhances the oral, anal and limb movements.
Eros- a winged figure of a child representing love or the power of love.
Thanatos- Psychoanalysis. The death instinct, esp. as expressed in violent aggression.
Oedipal crises- building-blocks
Castration complex- an unconscious fear of losing the genital organs, esp. as punishment for oedipal feelings.
Repression- the rejection from consciousness of painful or disagreeable ideas, memories, feelings, or impulses.
Transference- the shift of emotions, esp. those experienced in childhood, from one person or object to another, esp. the transfer of feelings about a parent to an analyst. 
Dissociation- the reversible resolution or decomposition of a complex substance into simpler constituents caused by variation in physical conditions, as when water gradually decomposes into hydrogen and oxygen under great heat in such a way that when the temperature is lowered the liberated elements recombine.
Attachment Theory- psychological, evolutionary and ethological theory that
provides a descriptive and explanatory framework for discussion
Ego Identity- The sense of oneself as a distinct continuous entity.
Scopophilia- the obtaining of sexual pleasure by looking at nude bodies, erotic photographs, etc. 
Penis envy- the repressed wish of a female to possess a penis.  
Projection- the tendency to ascribe to another person feelings, thoughts, or attitudes present in oneself, or to regard external reality as embodying such feelings, thoughts, etc., in some way. 
Neurosis- relatively mild personality disorder typified by excessive anxiety or indecision and a degree of social or interpersonal maladjustment.
Anxiety- distress or uneasiness of mind caused by fear of danger or misfortune. 
 
 
13 November 2007 @ 01:52 am
Are men and women really different?
 
            Ever since the beginning of time, men and women have been perceived as two completely different types of human beings. Although, as times have changed dramatically, men and women are starting to equalize socially and through their behavior, there is no doubt that men and women will continue to be different for many years to come. Biologically, men and women, of course born with different physical features, then create their cognitive and psychological thinking based on those specific features. On the other hand, through social factors, men and women act according to how society separates and defines how men and women should behave, think and believe. 
       The nature, biology and cognition of men and women have been mostly stable throughout history. Biologically, men and women are born with distinct features allowing them to perform their gender based actions such as women giving birth. Of course the obvious physical features such as breasts and hips on a woman, and a penis and Adam’s apple on a man are easily shown; studies show that there are other biological differences in men and women that can dig deeper into the basis of their cognition. For example, according to a new study, men and women have a differentiation in the brain; accounting for much of the gender based stereotypes demonstrated everything. The human brain is made primarily of two different types of tissue; gray matter and white matter. This new research suggests that men think more with their gray matter, and women think more with white. Since “gray matter represents information processing centers, whereas white matter works to network these processing centers,” this may explain why men and women do better in certain tasks such as mathematics and literature
 
 
12 November 2007 @ 03:58 pm
Annotated Bibliography
 
Lloyd, Robin. “Emotional Wiring Different in Men and Women.” Live Science. 2006. Special to LiveScience. November 11, 2007. http://www.livescience.com/health/060419_brain_wiring.html
 
 
This article explains in detail the specific difference in the emotional wiring of the human brain for males and females. Males wiring is directed towards the physical parts of the body, when it comes to aggression and fear, and women wiring is directed towards more cognitive factors such as the hypothalamus. This is just one example of how men and women differ in cognition and biology. This article can help me because it gives examples to further prove that men and women are biologically and psychologically different.
 
 
Carey, Bijorn. “Men and Women Really Do Think Differently.” Live Science. 2005. LiveScience Staff Writer. November 11, 2007. http://www.livescience.com/health/050120_brain_sex.html
 
            This article explains recent research about brain activity in males and females and its relation and explanation to cognition and thinking. Men and women use different parts of the brain to think and therefore are different in their thoughts. Although researchers believe that this does not affect intelligence factors, this differentiation may explain why men and women differ in tasks and abilities. I am able to use this article to further provide evidence for gender differentiation. This article also gives relation to the nurture side in perceiving why men and women are better at different tasks.
 
 
 The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. “Sex-Based Discrimination.” Government Statistics. 2006. November 11, 2007. http://www.eeoc.gov/types/sex.html
 
            Although this article is short, it gives numerical statistics about gender discrimintation and specific types of dicrimination that take place everyday. I can use this article to gives statistical evidence to the nurture side of the essay and how socialization has provided people with ways to disrciminate against either males or females.
 
 
Vogel, David L. “Confirming gender stereotypes: A social role perspective.” BNET Research Center. 2003. A journal of research. November 11, 2007. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2294/is_2003_June/ai_103381808
 
            This article specifies how popular culture embraces the idea of men and women being different. But the article also takes a stance on the other side, stating that men and women are generally not different. I thought it would be helpful to use an article opposing to my own view to add into my paper. The article also provies explainations of the Social Role Theory and the importance of gender differences.
 
 
Camporrimo, Rosaria. “Gender Differences in Human Cognition.” BNET Research Center. 1997. A journal of research. November 11, 2007. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2294/is_11-12_39/ai_53590328
 
            This article is also a book review, based on the book by Maccoby and Jacklin's critical work, The Psychology of Sex Differences (1974). The article goes step by step into reviewing the book. It gives examples of gender differences, discrimintations, and their importance upon society. Reviewing an acutal book can help make my essay more organized so that it makes sense and different ideas and topics are not mixed together throughout the essay.
 
 
24 October 2007 @ 08:55 pm

Nature vs. Nurture (Gender) Are men and women really different?


  1. Analyze the claim
    1. Nature- Men and women are born with different physical attributes and because of those physical differences, their mental and psychological stances act accordingly.
    2. Nurture- Society influences have grown so strong to the point where they shape specific ideas and stereotypes of how men and women should act and think.
    3. Gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, feminists, transvestites
  2. Analyze the reasons
    1. A woman’s body is structured in a way for her to be able to have children. This instills the motherly aspect in a woman’s life. This aspect leads to other psychological and mental differences which women have that men generally don’t. Also, mentally, women seem to mature faster than men.
    2. Men biologically have more strength and muscle. This instills the “manly” and “macho” idea in which most men thrive their selves upon. Their psychological and mental state then forms into this stance and creates the typical “man.”
    3. The reasons, although there are more that branch off from these, are relevant to the claim because they are good examples of how biologically physical attributes shape the mental ones as well.
    4. On the nurture side, women, starting from childhood, are given models of how women should think and act. Videos of helpless princesses, Barbie Dolls with perfect figures, bakery sets, baby dolls, etc all create the motherly aspect as well. This is only the childhood example.
    5. Men, on the other hand, are given big muscular firemen, racecars, and are shown videos of fighting ninjas and big scary dinosaurs. This is also only the childhood explanation.
    6. These reasons are relevant to the claim as well because they are clear examples of how socially related structures all portray the same feminine vs. masculine ideas, starting from childhood and growing as people get older.
  3. Analyze the Evidence
 

 

 
 
14 October 2007 @ 10:51 pm
                American Psycho is a thriller about an upper class New York investment banking executive who keeps his secret alternate psychopathic personality from his friends and co-workers. Patrick Bateman appears as a wealthy working man, educated and intelligent, charming and attractive. He spends his days working at the office, exercising at home, spending time with his fiancé, and the women he is cheating on her with. Although his life seems normal and luxurious, Patrick’s anger and frustration, hidden during the days, erupts at night through horrendous murders and homicidal activities.

Although on the surface American Psycho fits the profile of a slasher movie or thriller, the deeper image of the movie identifies differently. American psycho is a portrayal of modern man’s struggle to fit into society, while balancing the state between sane and psychotic. The film has also taken competition into account, and the common man’s fight to keep his stance in a capitalistic society. Christian Bale’s character represents both the realistic and fantasizing minds through with one battles another in hopes of achieving the American Dream. In order to remove or overpower competition, one must “stab in the back,” “kill likely opponents,” and simply “destroy everyone who gets in the way,” both metaphorically and literally. Patrick Bateman shows signs of his double life using symbolism, all throughout the film. By providing commentary, the audience not only views his appearance and actions, but also gets inside his mind, allowing the possible understanding of his actions throughout the film. In the introduction of the character, Bateman provides the audience with a figurative image as he slowly tears off an applied skin peal, therefore symbolizing the later obvious “mask” worn by Bateman as his anger grows deeper and deeper throughout the movie. As his “mask of sanity is about to slip,” Patrick continues to show his frustration with the world he lives in. In addition, the frequent appearance of the business card and its symbolic image towards competition between Bateman and his co-workers creates a metaphoric and somewhat humorous representation of what causes his anger and hatred towards others. The film provides specific close up camera angels and eerie music during these scenes to specify that these business cards, although appearing relatively the same in every aspect, are important demonstrations of how aggressive the corporate world can be. A frequent ironic expression is also exemplified in the film. The idea of materialism, and Patrick’s obsession with his belongings and outside health and appearance clash horribly with Patrick’s regard for the others around him. Treating his watch, car, apartment, face, and body, etc, with so much tender care and love, and then seeing every woman as a mere sexual object or “eye-candy” suggests this irony even further. Throughout the film, clothing is more important than skin, objects are more important than bones, and the flagrant disregard Patrick gives to respecting other humans is exemplified. Yet, the business itself is not the only aggressive action needed to take place in order to socially fit into a corporate world. Many instances during the film, the idea of reservation making seems to add on more to Bateman's frustration. The concept that if one cannot successfully make reservations at a certain restaurant, they are simply inferior to those who can. The restaurant Dorsia, which is mentioned many times throughout the movie, is the one place Bateman could not get a reservation into. After Bateman's first failed attempt, merely the word "Dorsia" would trigger Bateman's anger. This anger was embellished after Bateman's business rival, Paul Allen, mention his own reservation at the restaurant, therefore undermining Bateman's own egotistical mind and later leading him to Allen's brutal murder. Patrick’s anger, although locked up safely in his manikin of a body, tends to embellish slightly in many parts of the film. Whether he is warning the bartender lady about how he will brutally kill her, or threatening to kill the Asian woman of whom he is frustrated with, Patrick’s random outbursts prove how out of control he is with himself. Control is another key in Patrick’s thinking and actions. The control he wants over everyone around him creates even more anger and frustration when he does not contain any. For example, when Courtney’s wish to have dinner at Doris becomes impossible to provide, due to lack of reservation making ability, Patrick drugs her, in order to hypnotize Courtney into believing that they did in fact eat at Doris and that Patrick had all of the control required to make that happen. When calling in for a prostitute, Patrick makes a specific requirement that she should be blonde and nothing but blonde. In addition he also creates special names for every prostitute and demands that she only answer to that name. Patrick’s power and control thirst, since sometimes unattainable, creates much of the frustration built up in his mind.  

            Set in the 1980s, American Psycho centers its characters around selfish cutthroat competition and workers. The lack of consciousness created by the characters provides the audience with an understandable corporate cultural setting. The creation of the movie and the time period which it was set in (1980s) and released in (1990s) constructs this idea of stabbing in the back, simply to get to the front. The making of this movie, especially being set in a time period of conspicuous consumption and selfishness, provides a good yet gory example of corporate based behavior. This movie was made to cause an eye opening illustration to further demonstrate the start of this corporate competition and how is really has not changed to our current time period. Also the idea of conspicuous consumption is shown and its effect on man, or in this case, Patrick’s behavior. “As wealth accumulates on his hands, his own unaided effort will not avail to sufficiently put his opulence in evidence by this method” (Veblen).

            The main theory presented in the film, although it branches off into other ideas, is the theory of materialism, and the outcomes presented behaviorally by whoever becomes accustomed to it. Materialism is the “preoccupation with the material world, as opposed to intellectual or spiritual concepts, or to the theory that physical matter is all there is” (Philosophy). In addition, the idea that materialism causing man to shadow away any emotion, other than greed and disgust of course, is also presented throughout the film. In fact, Patrick Bateman’s words himself state that he has “no identifiable emotion, besides greed and disgust (American Psycho). For example, while walking through a dark alley, Patrick stumbles upon a cold and hungry homeless man. Although at first seeming truly sincere to help this poor man, Patrick’s mind set changes completely after stating the disgusting smell coming from the homeless man, then leading to the brutal murder of the homeless man, caused by Patrick and his handy knife. Additionally, the idea of smell or appearance is not only responsible to Patrick’s disgust, but also mental attitudes as well. When Gene, Patrick’s assistant, while sitting on the couch obliviously awaiting her death, starts answering questions based on aspirations and dreams rather than indecisiveness and confusion, Patrick immediately hesitates the murder. This demonstrates how disgust, whether physical or mental, is a common cause for Patrick’s frustration towards others. Greed, on the other hand, is the other emotion Patrick seems to contain, while excluding all of the others. Greed “causes the disgraceful corporate scandals that fill our newspapers. Greed is responsible for the endless stress and ruthless competition of the workplace and the strains and tensions” (Greeley). Patrick’s greed, obviously presented throughout the film, not only causes his anger and tension, but also creates the desire to murder the one person whose murder is investigated during the film. Paul Allen, one of Patrick’s largest competitors, is responsible for exploding the greed based anger contained in Patrick’s gut, just waiting to come out.

            In conclusion, American Psycho, although seeming like a typical gory thriller, is so much more once analyzed deeper. Set in the 1980’s, the movie exemplifies the corporate world, materialism and its effects on emotional imbalance, and conspicuous consumption and how each aspect of this crazy corporate time period instigates a psychotic being in each individual, how deceiving looks can be, and how “evil never looked so damn good.”

 
 
10 October 2007 @ 11:45 pm
A Brief History of Motivational Concepts, not only gives a history and explanation of what and how people are motivated, but also gives detailed points of view from difference theories and people. Yet before this can be done, the question must be asked: Why do people do what they do? How are they motivated?
             The article starts off with philosophical beginnings and theories from Thrasymachus and Socrates. Thrasymachus explains motivation as self-interest and how rulers set out rewards and punishments for behavior. Rulers act in their own self interest yet their power is limited by the people’s motivation to rebel. Socrates explains motivation as judgment. Being the complete opposite of Thrasymachus’s view, Socrates believes that if people were motivated by right the benefits of the right choice, then people would never be able to distinguish between right and wrong. Instead he believes that ones self interest may not be someone else’s. His view for motivation is that once one understands what is right and what is wrong, their behavior will act accordingly.
            Descartes, a leader of the scientific revolution, left the idea of reflex. This idea surfaces around the basic science of motivation and that animal is a machine moved by a force applied to them. If a person’s foot comes near a fire, the force of pain causes them to pull their leg back. Also knee jerks, pupil movement and other reactions create a machinelike transmission from the brain to the muscle. Hobbes on the other hand, reviewed the ideas of Empiricism and Hedonism. His belief was around the mental force, not the physical force as described by Descartes. He created the idea that the outside world shapes the mental mindset, and then that mindset acts as the force to control behavior, therefore being a motivation. All knowledge is received from senses. Kant and the organization of the mind opposes this idea in that we do not learn from our experiences, yet from what we perceive from our experiences and learn and behave based on that understanding. The idea of cause and effect is irrelevant to Kent’s theory, better yet; aspects acquired by knowledge are innate.
              While analyzing each person’s view and theory of behavior and motivational history, it is hard to select just one to fit my own personal opinion. Yet my own opinion would compare best with Hobbes’s view of Empiricism and Hedonism and Thrasymachus’s view of the selfish motivation. Simply that people learn and react from their experiences and direct those actions toward self interested goals are the mixture made between these two views of motivation. Experience is the cause to physical and mental actions, and these actions are self based.     
 
 
03 October 2007 @ 10:25 pm
 
            American Psycho is a thriller about an upper class New York investment banking executive who keeps his secret alternate psychopathic personality from his friends and co-workers. Patrick Bateman appears as a wealthy working man, educated and intelligent, charming and attractive. He spends his days working at the office, exercising at home, spending time with his fiancé, and the women he is cheating on her with. Although his life seems normal and luxurious, Patrick’s anger and frustration, hidden during the days, erupts at night through horrendous murders and homicidal activities. Although on the surface American Psycho fits the profile of a slasher movie or thriller, the deeper image of the movie identifies differently. American psycho is a portrayal of modern man’s struggle to fit into society, while balancing the state between sane and psychotic. The film has also taken competition into account, and the common man’s fight to keep his stance in a capitalistic society. Christian Bale’s character represents both the realistic and fantasizing minds through with one battles another in hopes of achieving the American Dream. In order to remove or overpower competition, one must “stab in the back,” “kill likely opponents,” and simply “destroy everyone who gets in the way,” both metaphorically and literally. Patrick Bateman shows signs of his double life using symbolism, all throughout the film. By providing commentary, the audience not only views his appearance and actions, but also gets inside his mind, allowing the possible understanding of his actions throughout the film. (specific quote). In the introduction of the character, Bateman provides the audience with a figurative image as he slowly tears off an applied skin peal, therefore symbolizing the later obvious “mask” worn by Bateman as his anger grows deeper and deeper throughout the movie. In addition, the frequent appearance of the buisness card and its symbloic image towards competition between Bateman and his co-workers, creates a metaphoric and somewhat humorous representation of what causes his anger and hatred towards others. The film provides specific close up camera angels and eerie music during these scenes to specify that these buisness cards, although appearing relatively the same in every aspect, are important demonstrations of how aggressive the corporate world can be. Yet, the buisness itself is not the only agressive action needed to take place in order to socially fit into a corporate world. Many instances durin the film, the idea of reservation making seems to add on more to Bateman's frustration. The concept that if one cannot successfully make reservations at a certain restaraunt, they are simply inferior to those who can. The restaraunt Dorsia, which is mentioned many times throughout the movie, is the one place Bateman could not get a reservation into. After Bateman's first failed attempt, merely the word "Dorsia" would trigger Bateman's anger. This anger was embellished after Bateman's buisness rival, Paul Allen, mention his own reservation at the restaraunt, therefore undermining Bateman's own egotictical mind and later leading him to Allen's brutal murder.

Paul Allen's character also plays a vital role in demonstrating the cutthroat competition  
            Set in the 1980s, American Psycho centers its characters around selfish cutthroat competition and workers. The lack of consciousness created by the characters provides the audience with an understandable corporate cultural setting. The creation of the movie and the time period which is was set (1980s) and released in (1990s) constructs this understanding if stabbing in the back, simply to get to the front.
 
 
30 September 2007 @ 06:24 pm
Bradley, Ed. “Can A Video Game Lead To Murder?” CBS News. June 19, 2005. 30 September 2007.<http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/17/60minutes/main 702599.shtml>
 
Castillo, Paul. “The negative effects of Disney on children.” Daily Sundial Online. December 2006. 30 September 2007. < http://media.sundial.csun.edu/media/storage/pap er862/news/2006/12/04/Opinion/The-Negative.Effects.Of.Disney.On.Children-2520508.shtml>
 
 
Scott, John. “Rational Choice Theory.” Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of The Present30 September 2007. < http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~scottj/socscot7.htm> (2000.) 1 paragraph.
 
Siegel, Larry J. Criminology the Core. 3rd Edition. Thomas Learning Inc. (2005).
 
 
United States. Marriage and Divorce. US Department of Health and Human Services.6 October 2006. 30 September 2007. < http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm>
 
 
 
 
 
 
20 September 2007 @ 11:48 pm
                                                                           Think Piece for Bell Hooks

   This article describes the horrors and dangers of what may come from giving the “gaze.” The author describes first, as a child, how “the gaze” seemed to act as a political aspect or maybe a “challenge to authority.” Her examples show a sense of power that any share or gaze may contain, depending on how it is used. She then relates it to slavery, and how slaves were denied the right to gaze. This directly connects the gaze to blacks in general and how the denial of the right to gaze led to the desire to rebel and oppose against this domination. The “gaze” then turned from simply a stare or look, to a global resistance for colonized black people. The symbolic gaze then turned to the media and, as the author states, and is what started the independent black cinema. Blacks also started observing whites on the screen, since most did not get much communication with them while only working with other blacks. Pretty soon, the enjoyment of the black cinema became dehumanizing and degrading.
            The author then switches to the idea of feminism and how the “gaze” and black media relate to black women as well. Black independent film makers use black women as their main gaze targets and objects. When black women were key objects in white cinema, the viewers did not realize that they were looking at black woman, unless of course the movie was about blacks itself. The seduction given off by the black women created a quick sense of forgetting about racism, and simply a sense of adoring the female appearance. This creates the feeling for the to the fact that “mainstream feminist film criticism in no way acknowledges black female spectatorship.” Her belief that women are so abused by the “gaze” continues as she states the racist and sexist, white male driven, media world we live in.
            This article, although slightly confusing at some times, got me thinking of society in general, and how we, sociologically, can relate something as small as a “gaze” media, feminism, racism, and gender. This also relates to what we have been learning in class, and how something simple and small, when asked a lot of questions, can bring up bigger and more detailed contained subjects. Something simple and small, the “gaze,” brings up such strong sociological aspects and relates to each thoroughly. Starting off comparing the “gaze” to childhood and then to slavery, and then somehow creating a comparison to black women on television just made me think of how any small aspect of life can be in someway a causation to most of the discrimination or ideologies we experience everyday in society.
 
 
11 September 2007 @ 02:26 am
Happily Ever After
As a child, story time is always an exciting experience. Of course it always starts off with the common phrase “Once upon a time…” and ends with a wonderful “Happily Ever After.” It always seems that in every story you were told growing up, life just constantly seemed to end perfectly, no matter what. I wonder what a child’s reaction to a story ending in death or agony would be. Of course society cannot allow children’s toys and videos to expose such terror, such dreadful events, or what some may call such reality. The truth is that these toys and videos create a false sense of reality and further implement a condescending image of social expectation into the minds of the children whom are subjected to them. It is no lie that a child’s mind is like a clump of clay, open to whatever molding or formation comes in its direction. It is amazing how something as simple as a Barbie Doll can evolve a developing mind into what our society has currently been formed into today.
Do you ever wonder why, when a child is born, they are automatically given belongings containing one color; pink or blue, depending on their gender? With that in mind, certain questions arise such as; can this type of child nurturing be a key cause to the creation of much of the gender discrimination and stereotyping which occurs in our society? Gender discrimination is represented in our society everyday through social expectation, media, idealism, feminism etc. But who knew that the basic foundation for this discrimination started at birth? When a child is born, they are given a signature color of which all of their surroundings contain. How many baby boys wear pink clothing and sleep with pink blankets? Not too many, in fact, once the child is born, everything around him/her is either blue or pink, depending on their gender. Then as they grow older, they start to play with toys and games. The girls skip down the isles of the stores picking out dolls with matching outfits and princess crows with sparkles and glitter. The boys, on the other hand grab the action figures, race cars, and swords with blood dripping from the end. How does this instant desire to attain a specific type of toy come into play? Were the male children taught to only reach for the cars and weapons? This gender stereotyping is a leading factor to much discrimination shown as these children get older. While the little boy is fighting with the fake guns and swords, his sister is baking chocolate brownies and serving them at her tea party. So when the joke is asked; “When is a woman ever above a man? When the kitchen is on the top floor,” we know that this discrimination was provided at a very young age. Our society’s idealism as a whole has been created by what was instilled into our minds in our childhood. For example, the one and only Walt Disney is responsible for much of these idealistic images. Both and male and female main characters, of course having perfect appearance, have a signature role in each movie. The male of course is the dominant figure, with thick muscles and a charming smile, while the female, also know as the damsel in distress, has an “ideal” figure, with emphasis on her breasts and an obvious sign of vulnerability and the belief that she cannot survive without the male. Every little girl who watches these videos wants a princess crown, and dresses like her favorite character on Halloween. But looking at the image a little deeper, “All of Disney's princesses, and even some of the female villains, are impossibly proportioned…teaching little girls they are supposed to be complacent and weak if they want to be successful” (Castillo). Simply by watching theses movies, little girls have already started their attempt to matching what society “expects” all women to look and act like. Studies have shown that if a Barbie Doll were brought to real life, her figure would not only be impossible to achieve, but the size of her breasts in proportion to her waist, would tip her over.
Of course gender discrimination is only a small part of the whole. The protagonist vs. antagonist perception provides a representation that the “bad guy” is usually ugly and deformed in some way. This can also relate to false reality, in creating an understanding that a “bad guy” will always have these distinct details which will make him/her stand out of the crowd and be shown. False reality is also another issue which children are subjected to everyday. The idea of true love, and the belief that everyone will find their mate, get married and live happily ever after. No one ever sees a caption at the end of Cinderella stating “and the price and Cinderella got married, but after the prince cheated on Cinderella with Snow White, they got a divorce and never spoke to each other again…the end.” With every child expecting to find true love, marry that true love, and live happily ever after, there is so much room for disappointment when they find out that over half of American marriages end in divorce (NCHS).
Can a false sense of reality even lead to criminal or deviant behavior in our society? Once a false reality is established through children’s media, what happens after these children grow up disappointed and confused when everything, which seemed so easy to obtain in the movies and videos, is not reality? Could this confusion and frustration be a cause to adolescent and teenage crime? According to criminologists, the rational choice theory is based “around the idea that all action is fundamentally 'rational' in character and that people calculate the likely costs and benefits of any action before deciding what to do” (Scott). In relation to this theory the false realities exposed to children alter their decision making process regarding what is to be expected in the real world. Their want to achieve what was represented in that false reality creates the motive to take matters into their own hands, even if that means deviating against society. The “benefit” gradually becomes greater than the “cost.” In fact, according to criminologist Larry J. Siegel, “teenagers have extremely high crime rates...and the greatest influence on crime trends.” He even mentions that “kids who commit a lot of crime early in childhood will continue to commit crime in their adolescence and into adulthood…the more teens in the population, the higher the crime rate” (Siegel 34). One way this was demonstrated was after the legalization of abortion in the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. A dramatic decrease in crime rates occurred in 1985…18 years later. So with all of this in mind, the fact that teens provide our society with most crime rates has to be in some way related to what they were taught only a few years earlier.
Another way children’s toys may create a false sense of reality is through video games. In many video games, not only is the animation realistic and similar to real life images, but the messages given off throughout the game expose children to violent behavior. Hijacking cars, shooting and mugging people, crashing vehicles into one another, are actions required in these games. The more this violent behavior takes place, the more points the player gets, in hopes of eventually winning the game. Who is to say that the continuous practice of these actions will not cause a child or teenager to see these actions as acceptable or allowed in society? For example, Devin Moore, an 18 year old boy, had played the game “Grand Theft Auto” days and nights for months. After being exposed to the required, beating and murdering of policemen, Moore decided to go on an adventure of his own, murdering three men in the process. (Bradley). Can the false realities created by the game lead a boy to murder? In addition, the gaining of “points” in a game establish the sense of achievement, which enables the player to feel accomplished within society generating a false understanding that in order to survive in society, these actions must take place. 
In conclusion, after searching deeper into the “magical” and “wonderful” world of child media, many negative effects have been found. Three, for example, would be the cause of much of the gender discrimination which takes place in our society, the start of criminal or deviant behavior caused by a false reality of a harsh world, and the cause of criminal actions due to entertainment based false representations of society. This interaction between children and their media affects them in so many different ways, starting off at birth and continuing throughout the rest of their lives.
 
 
 
 
 
05 September 2007 @ 12:30 am
Think Piece 1
 
            PEACH, Types of Feminism, is an article used to define and describe the different forms of feminism. Liberal feminism is the form of feminism most directed towards the issue as a whole rather than to each and every detail. Since liberal feminism seems to leave out specific characteristics of woman such as color and class, it is criticized most by non-liberal feminists. Liberal feminism rests on the issue that both men and women are created equally. Socialist/Marxist feminism is based on the issue of how socioeconomic roles are dominated by men. This type of feminism believes that females should be placed in higher positions in order to end women’s oppression and reduce the male supremacy. Radical feminists strongly theorize that male domination is caused by male control of female sexuality and reproductive ability. This type of feminism opposes the liberal feminists. Cultural, gender, or difference voice feminism hypothesize that rather than biological factors, women are different to men in a sense that they have difference moral sensibility. Many authors have argued that women’s care and sensibility have culturally incorporated them into traditional public roles. Womanist feminism criticize the idea of “feminism” as a whole, and how it fails to acknowledge certain aspects shared by many women such as color and social status. Ecofeminism relates nature with women and their relationship and identification with one another. Lesbian feminism came about from the lesbian disenchantment during the women’s movement in the late 1970’s and 1980’s. Postcolonial/Third World Feminism was created by women of color who found that mainstream feminism failed to acknowledge them. The relationship between these women have seemed to join them together in being victims of not only gender discrimination, but racial as well. Postmodern feminism challenge universal ideas and principles. This is the most recent form of feminism.
            Within this article, each type of feminism is described and compared to other types of feminism. While analyzing each type of feminism, I have come to a conclusion of which type best fits my own perspective. Although many parts to each type of feminism can relate to my opinion, the type that I agree with the most would be cultural, gender, or different voice feminism. This type makes more sense than any of the others because it relates to the idea of nature vs. nurture. Rather than women oppression being biologically based, it is more commonly driven from the idea that women have an increased sensibility about the world. People have this general idea of women as a whole and how they fit a certain role in life. Women and men’s difference is not only based on the fact that they are biologically built a certain way. It is more based on the fact that women and men have been created to fit into society a certain way throughout the years. Yet recently, it has been shown that women are becoming more and more dominating in male driven places. Soon enough, the “culture” of women and their equality with men will have changed to something extremely different from what was considered traditional in earlier days.    
 
 
 
 

Advertisement

Customize